Media Mentions
Schulte partner Ian Levin quoted on the FTC’s non-compete ban in The Drawdown
May 8, 2024
Schulte Roth & Zabel partner Ian Levin spoke with The Drawdown for the article, “The FTC’s non-compete ban and its consequences.”
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a final rule banning non-compete clauses on April 23, 2024. However, within 24 hours, two lawsuits were filed against the rule, with a third following later in the week. The chair of the FTC, Lina M Khan, argues that non-compete clauses keep wages low, stifle innovation and hinder economic growth.
Ian highlighted the potential impacts on private equity firms, stating, “Private equity is potentially affected at two levels. Internally, firms use non-competes to protect their IP and confidential information. While the same concerns exist at the portfolio company level, talent is often the ‘product’ they’re backing, particularly at portfolio companies that provide services. If the FTC rule were to become effective, they could be at risk of losing their investments overnight.”
Non-compete clauses aren't the sole method to retain talent; the industry's carry structure, which incentivizes seniority and long-term commitment, plays a role. Ian noted how the FTC rule's broad wording might encompass other retention measures, raising concerns about unintended consequences.
“While the preamble to the FTC rule elaborates on what is intended by the rule, the wording of the rule itself is so broad, it potentially captures any measures designed to prevent employees from leaving, such as long-term incentive and other deferred compensation arrangements. Hopefully, we will see more guidance from the FTC on this, as it might be an unintended consequence,” he added.
Read the article here.
Related People
Related Insights
Alerts
On June 28, 2024, the US Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would amend existing anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (“AML/CFT”) program[1] regulations to require that financial institutions establish, implement and maintain effective, risk-based and reasonably designed AML/CFT programs with certain minimum components, including a mandatory risk assessment process (hereinafter, “Proposed Rule”).[2] For purposes of the Proposed Rule, “financial institutions” include: banks; broker dealers; mutual funds; futures commission merchants (“FCMs”) and introducing brokers in commodities (“IB-Cs”); insurance companies; money services businesses (“MSBs”); casinos and card clubs; dealers in precious metals, precious stones or jewels; operators of credit card systems; loan or finance companies; and housing government sponsored enterprises.[3] In addition to establishing minimum risk assessment requirements for these AML/CFT programs, the Proposed Rule would require that financial institutions document each component of their AML/CFT programs and make this documentation available to FinCEN or its designee, which can include the appropriate agency to which FinCEN has delegated examination authority,[4] or the appropriate SRO.[5] The Proposed Rule would also require that these AML/CFT programs be approved and overseen by the financial institution’s board of directors or, if the financial institution does not have a board of directors, an equivalent governing body.
Alerts
On June 28, 2024, the US Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would amend existing anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (“AML/CFT”) program[1] regulations to require that financial institutions establish, implement and maintain effective, risk-based and reasonably designed AML/CFT programs with certain minimum components, including a mandatory risk assessment process (hereinafter, “Proposed Rule”).[2] For purposes of the Proposed Rule, “financial institutions” include: banks; broker dealers; mutual funds; futures commission merchants (“FCMs”) and introducing brokers in commodities (“IB-Cs”); insurance companies; money services businesses (“MSBs”); casinos and card clubs; dealers in precious metals, precious stones or jewels; operators of credit card systems; loan or finance companies; and housing government sponsored enterprises.[3] In addition to establishing minimum risk assessment requirements for these AML/CFT programs, the Proposed Rule would require that financial institutions document each component of their AML/CFT programs and make this documentation available to FinCEN or its designee, which can include the appropriate agency to which FinCEN has delegated examination authority,[4] or the appropriate SRO.[5] The Proposed Rule would also require that these AML/CFT programs be approved and overseen by the financial institution’s board of directors or, if the financial institution does not have a board of directors, an equivalent governing body.